A legal immigrant speaks out...

Written by David DiCrescenzo on . Posted in Guest Articles

Publisher’s note:  Sybele Capezzutti has once again put some thoughts together and states very plainly what we are facing with regards to our porous border.  For my money, we could use a lot more legal immigrants like her and a whole lot less of what has been invading and infecting our country like a viral parasite feeding off a host; oh wait…that’s what the illegals are.  

Sybele Capezzutti:  I've been asked why I'm against open borders and do not support Obama's views on illegal immigration being that I am an immigrant myself.

First, I am a legal immigrant that followed the law and as such it is an insult to someone like me that people that chose not to follow the law is being rewarded for their actions instead of being punished.

Second, and most important....the kind of people that resort to illegally entering or staying in the country are exactly the kind of people that I would have never associated with in my country of birth. They didn't follow the laws there, they were not educated in their own language, they had no skills to survive there, they did not contribute to society there, and they only come here because this government offers more than the government where they came from. 

These are people that I would have stayed away from in my own country of birth and now I'm being told that I have to be compassionate and welcome them here?

I spent years in Florida and had very few Brazilian friends because I refused to be involved with a community of illegals that couldn't even speak and write in their own language properly, that scammed the system every way possible, they were embarrassing to me!

To the ones that support amnesty, please understand something....there are only 2 reasons why someone was not able to get a passport and/or a visa: One cannot obtain a passport by their own government if they have a criminal record, it’s that simple. And if you are able to get a passport but not a visa it's because the American Consulate has done the proper background check and either found legal reasons (criminal record) or economic reasons (lack of proof of income or ties to the country of birth) to deny the visa. And honest people who are denied a visa do not resort to entering the country illegally, that's a fact. Most of the illegals crossing the border don't even have a passport, which puts them on the first case scenario.

It's not that complicated! 

And to use as a base for supporting this ludicrous immigration bill all the Irish, German and Italian immigrants of the past is not only insulting to my intelligence but plain ignorant!

Yes, they were poor immigrants, but they were LEGAL and the country wanted them here to grow both the agriculture and factory industries, we actually needed more labor at the time, and those immigrants embraced the American culture and loved this country for the opportunity they were given, something I don't see coming from illegals.

I'm sick and tired of the propaganda from the left and the tireless effort to flood America with the scum of the earth by using the compassion card! 

It is a marxist strategy, no ifs or buts about it, and all of you that support this insanity are being used through your "white guilt".

Simply pathetic!

Add a comment

Will the Supreme Court Put Itself on the Wrong Side of History?

Written by David DiCrescenzo on . Posted in Guest Articles

Publisher’s note:  With the decision by SCOTUS down to days or hours, this timely and very well thought out, if necessarily a tad lengthy, article by Tim Dunkin is a must read.  

Tim very clearly points out the parallels between what the slave owners of yesteryear and the powerful “Big Gay” lobby of today are doing.

I would ask that all of my readers take the time to read and consider Tim’s argument. 

Tim Dunkin:  Sometime later this month, possibly as early as next week, the Supreme Court of the United States of America is going to impose gay “marriage” onto every state in the union. They will not do so because there are any sound or convincing moral, ethical, legal, or (especially) constitutional arguments in favor of gay “marriage.”  Rather, they will do so because the political class in America wants it, and as recent experience has shown, the political class nearly always gets what it wants, regardless of what We the People think.  

The Left likes to flatter itself by asserting that the push for gay “marriage” is about liberty. Indeed, they have been quite successful in convincing themselves that it is the “new civil rights struggle,” as if the push for a special redefinition of marriage for the benefit of a group of people who choose their lifestyle and who already enjoyed equality before the law and the full panoply of constitutional liberties, and who are in fact more well-off than the average American, can in any way, shape, or form compare their experience with an entire race of people (born that way) who spent several centuries in slavery, and then another century after that being cheated of the civil rights that they had been promised but never really given.  Please.  What tone-deaf, illiterate nonsense on the part of the gays and their supporters.  

Instead (as I have been pointing out for years, and which recent months have been proving me right about), the radical gay agenda is antithetical to our constitutional rights.  Freedom of religion?  Nope.  Freedom of association?  Nope.  Freedom of speech?  Nope.   The Left has systematically been setting out to use the power of government to curtail exactly those constitutional liberties that would allow folks to live their own lives apart from having to support the gay agenda, among other things, with which they disagree.  Gay “marriage” has been playing a huge, huge part in this destruction of liberty.

In doing this, the Supreme Court will be mimicking in spirit an earlier terrible ruling that also set back the cause of the expansion of genuine liberty in America for decades – the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.  

The parallels here are uncanny.  In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a small but wealthy minority, generally localized into a certain geographical area, which purported to represent its entire section but which really did not, and which used its disproportionate political power to dominate one political party while bullying the other into acquiescing to its wishes most of the time.  The slaveholding plantation owners, always a small percentage of the population, nevertheless were the wealthiest people in the South, and held more wealth in aggregate than even northern industrialists and shipping magnates at the time.  This slaveholding class was concentrated, for the most part, in the flatlands of the Atlantic and Caribbean coasts, and up the Mississippi river. The slaveholders constantly presented themselves as the representatives of “the South,” even though most Southerners didn’t own slaves, and the small farmers in the mountains had almost nothing in common with them.   Before the war, they largely controlled the Democratic Party, and were able to influence the Whigs far more than they should have.  

So today, the Supreme Court is set to rule in favor of a small but wealthy minority, generally localized into a certain geographical, which purports to represent its entire section but which really does not, and which uses its disproportionate political power to dominate one political party while bullying the other into acquiescing to its wishes most of the time.  Gays are wealthier, per capita, than the average American due largely to the fact that their lifestyle is a concomitant with the decadence that generally attends to wealth and leisure.  Gays are mostly found in liberal enclaves on the coasts and around a few major progressive cities in the interior.  Gays purport to find support among the large majority of Americans, even though they do not (as the actual voting has always shown).  And gays pretty much control the Democrat Party, and have been successful in cowing most Republican politicians into yielding to them as well.  

Add a comment

Josh Duggar, Atheists, and Pedophiles

Written by David DiCrescenzo on . Posted in Guest Articles

Publisher's note:  Tim Dunkin continues to be on top of his game dissecting current stories and effortlessly connecting them to the critical, underlying issues they are symptomatic of.  In this particular case, one I discussed about a year and a half ago.  Excellent on point read.

Tim Dunkin:  By now, many readers have probably heard about the recent revelation that Josh Duggar, the oldest son of Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar of 19 Kids and Counting fame, has admitted to molesting some young girls a decade ago when he was a teenager.  The information about this came out recently when a heavily redacted police report from 2006 was released by In Touch Weekly detailing the incidents.  Duggar has since apologized for the acts, even as the scandal has grown and the Duggar's television show has been pulled from TLC.  

I have no interest here in defending Josh Duggar or his family – even though he was a teenager, Josh still committed terrible crimes against several young girls, and it appears that his family was complicit in trying to cover up the series of incidents so that scandal didn't brew.  They all should have faced the consequences for their actions, which would most likely entail jail time, both for the molestation itself as well as the act of interfering with an investigation.    And while I firmly believe that God's grace can cover all the sins of any who repent, at the same time, Scripture clearly teaches that we must face the earthly consequences of our actions – even when the perpetrator is a professing Christian who has repented and been forgiven.  Jesus is not a “get out of jail free” card and treating Him that way for purposes of political expediency is an insult to the Saviour.  

However, the radical Left has been making hay of the whole matter.  The usual suspects in the internet kookosphere are practically salivating over reporting about the “anti-gay hypocrite” who got caught diddling little girls.  Using their usual leaps of illogic, they're trying to spread the guilt around to implicate all Christians, conservatives, opponents of “gay marriage,” and anyone else deemed an “enemy of progress.”

So it was when I recently came across a discussion on the Facebook feed of some atheist who is friends with a mutual acquaintance, the tenor of the comments was about what I expected.  So naturally, I had to jump in.  After a couple of go-arounds involving the usual silliness you expect when debating with atheists, I got down to the point and asked a couple of those “armor-piercing” questions that penetrate to the core of the dispute.  I simply asked...

Add a comment

Remembering our fallen...

Written by David DiCrescenzo on . Posted in Guest Articles

Publisher's note:  Today being a day set aside to remember our fallen heroes, Sybele Capezzutti, an occasional contributor to The Patriots Press remembered her former father in law, a man named Al, and has graciously shared some of her fond memories of him.  A very fitting tribute to one soldier while offering a salute to all of the men and women that gave it all.

If you missed the 3:00 moment of silence, take a moment wherever you are and just offer a silent prayer for those who have served and are now gone.

Sybele Capezzutti:  The ones close to me know my great love and respect for my former father in law, who unfortunately is no longer with us.

We spent hours sitting at his back yard while he smoked a cigar and told me his war stories, he always tried to make light of it as he told them in a very casual and matter of fact way.... but I could feel the deep sadness in his heart.

He was wounded trying to save his platoon and received several medals, including the Bronze Medal and a Purple Heart; all of which sat in a box and he never even mentioned it until I decided to frame them and give him the respect he deserved.

The medals meant nothing to him, the memories meant everything!

For all his life he carried the pain of seeing his friends die in combat, the guilt for being back home with his family while so many didn't return.

They were young men, all from the same neighborhood, and some gave all. I've learned a lot from Al through the years of spending those precious afternoons with him....I've learned about friendship, resilience, honor, and patriotism.

There is no glory in war, and oh....how I wish we would never have to fight another war again!  But there is glory in a soldier, in his love of country, in his dedication to freedom, in his selfless acts to keep his brothers safe during battle, in his heart that aches forever tormented by the memories he has to carry, and in the ultimate sacrifice leaving behind loved ones as his body lies lifeless on the battle ground.

Hate the war, but love and respect the warrior, their sacrifice is for you, be thankful!  On this Memorial Day let's join Col. West in a moment of silence at 3 pm and show our respect for the fallen, they've given way more than 1 minute of their lives for you.

Add a comment

One man's opinion of our decaying nation

Written by David DiCrescenzo on . Posted in Guest Articles

Publisher’s note:  I was gonna rant today.  My Oatmeal at Micky D’s wasn’t as hot as I like it, my car is making a new noise, one of my good friends went through a verbal gauntlet today, (although he shined like the champion he is) and while I don’t have any real reason to, I just felt like letting loose.  

Thankfully, another great friend and a guy with just an amazing flare with words did rant.  Since I like his rant better than what I was probably gonna say, and God knows it saved me an hour, I decided to let him speak for me.  Thank you Clarke J. Jones, Jr.

 

Clarke J. Jones, Jr.:  There are several things that we can count on as perpetual constants in today's society. The usual, obvious ones include the end of mortality, taxes, eternal salvation to all believers in Christ and bills, to name a few.

However, as of late we are realizing numerous unwelcome additions to this list of life experiences in alarming numbers. These include the secularist, humanist domination of our culture, the denouncement of religious convictions as applied to and through our government, the denigration and de-sanctification of marriage, the neglect of our youth by an unhealthy number of self absorbed Americans, pagan ideologies of dubious origin being recognized as acceptable, the legitimization of Sharia Law, an all encompassing, somewhat hypnotic worship of pop culture and a national fascination with sexual deviancy and wanton promiscuity.

I am truly sickened by what has happened to this country in nearly every facet of our society. We as a nation twice elected a mental midget in the MIC, a man who grew up hating everything we stand for. This man takes the definitions of words like fraud, charlatan, huckster and yes, subversive to levels we've not ever seen in our highest office.

The MIC, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Harry Reid, Eric Holder, George Stephanopolis and those like them have devised a plan for this country against the will of all, like you and I who appreciate and love it. They have cleverly divided us along racial lines, dismantled our founding documents, placated our enemies, disarmed our once salient perimeters, reduced our military to a point of weakness and glorified all that is ungodly.

They have abused our allies to a point that we are no longer credible while bowing to adversaries whose intentions are to destroy us.

Yes, I am ranting.

 

Add a comment