Filibuster...democrat style
Publisher's note: Imre Beke is not a name you might be familiar with; however he is among the few that can take very little and build it into much. He is a very bright, down to earth guy, an IT genius, a dad, a Patriot, a radio talk show host, and the sort of individual I am proud to call my friend.
As you will see by the following article, he is also a very astute political thinker, and whether you agree with him or not, he has the ability to grab your attention as he very skillfully presents his case on this very critical issue.
It is my distinct privilege and pleasure to introduce Mr. Imre Beke to the readers of The Patriots Press.
Imre Beke: The history of the Senate is the story of a body which - in the world's most democratic and open society - is singularly undemocratic.
When the Constitution was framed, the Senate was created as a body which represented not the people of the United States but the Governments of the individual States. In this way, although the Constitution made Federal laws superior to State laws, the States had - collectively speaking - veto power over the passage of Federal law. In order for a Federal law to be enacted, you had to have agreement between the majority of the Representatives of the People of the country (in the House), the majority of the States (by way of the Senate) and the country's Chief Executive.
This positioned the States as co-equal with the Federal Government, which made the accrual of centralized power as a form of tyranny over the People all but impossible.
Moreover, the States had a special way of stopping the passage of legislation which conflicted with the interests of one or more of their number. That tool was called the filibuster. Basically, any single Senator could speak as long as he wanted to without interruption by anyone. Nobody could take the floor from him under any circumstances. He could yield the floor to others who were helping him with the filibuster but that was voluntary and he always got the floor back.
In this way, any one Senator could stop a piece of legislation dead in its tracks.
Although the word "filibuster" was first used to describe the procedure in 1853, the use of the institution goes back to ancient Rome. Ironically, one of the first attempts to end filibusters using methods which were less than democratic was when Julius Caesar - who would later become absolute ruler of the Roman Empire, transforming it from a republic to what was essentially a dictatorship - had one of his rivals jailed in order to end a filibuster. The tactic backfired and Caesar did not get his way but his ruthlessness only grew worse until he eventually personified absolute power.